In loving memory of Kenis D. Keathley 6/4/81 - 3/27/22 Loving father, husband, brother, friend and firewood hoarder Rest in peace, Dexterday

chain gauge ?

Discussion in 'Chainsaws and Power Equipment' started by Chud, Jan 3, 2021.

  1. The Wood Wolverine

    The Wood Wolverine

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    17,358
    Likes Received:
    108,993
    Location:
    Gettysburg, PA
    Lotta good info being thrown around. :thumbs::yes:

    Fiddy on everything for me except the long bar, which is 63. Only reason for 63 was that the deal I found happened to be that gauge.
     
  2. Screwloose

    Screwloose

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2017
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes Received:
    29,903
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ok my opinion....
    You're never going to see a strength advantage as a failure always propagates from a defect, as little as a scratch trumps thickness. Weakest link.
    Oiling difference is meaningless at the oil volume vs speed ratios we are dealing with.
    A worn .050" bar cleans up
    nicely, sometimes immediately accepting a. 063" chain.
    I know my stihl chains in .050" have the driver half at .050" and the other half at .063". So when someone says to you that the gauge changes kerf, hp required, bar binding and drag.....
    Sorry the ramblings of a anal machinist.
     
    T.Jeff Veal and Eric Wanderweg like this.
  3. The Wood Wolverine

    The Wood Wolverine

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    17,358
    Likes Received:
    108,993
    Location:
    Gettysburg, PA
    So a thicker piece of metal isn't stronger? :confused: Doesn't sound logical to me. Maybe I'm reading the post wrong.
     
    T.Jeff Veal and Screwloose like this.
  4. Screwloose

    Screwloose

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2017
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes Received:
    29,903
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Thicker is stronger but on a stihl chain for example the part of the link that is giving you the tensile strength is the same across all the gauges. But what I was saying is that the .013" variance isn't going to make a difference as to snapping chains. Examine a broken chain under a lens and you will see that the failure wasn't do to a tensile strength failure but rather a defect or fatigue failure. And in that case such a small thickness doesn't help much.
     
  5. Screwloose

    Screwloose

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2017
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes Received:
    29,903
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Screenshot_20210105-173501_Chrome.jpg
    So I Googled it and this came up. Maybe this makes more sense.
     
  6. Cold Trigger Finger

    Cold Trigger Finger

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2017
    Messages:
    2,669
    Likes Received:
    15,686
    Location:
    Easern Central Alaska

    The outside width of the chain is only 13 thousandths wider in 63 gauge compared to 50 gauge.
    Not enough to talk about.
    But having snapped over a hundred chains in my career . I can guarantee that 63 ga is stronger than 50 ga.
    Yes big bow bellied bared racing saws have more actual horsepower and torque than most all fallin saws.
    But, put a good set of dogs on a race saw and get up on a spring board, 3 boards high. Take your race saw and dog in for starting your Humboldt face on a big hard old growth western hemlock and see how long it takes to rip your chain in half.
    It happens.
    I don't know a timber faller running 660 s ect that used 50 ga chain. .063 ga only.
    I have run 50 gauge on 266 s, 044s, 371+372s ect with 32" bars . And even those little saws would break a chain on occasion.
    5 cube saws and bigger would wreck them pretty quick. Especially on 36" bars.