In loving memory of Kenis D. Keathley 6/4/81 - 3/27/22 Loving father, husband, brother, friend and firewood hoarder Rest in peace, Dexterday

Interesting article

Discussion in 'The Wood Pile' started by MikeInMa, Nov 17, 2020.

  1. MikeInMa

    MikeInMa

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2016
    Messages:
    14,569
    Likes Received:
    103,927
    Location:
    Southern Worcester county
  2. buZZsaw BRAD

    buZZsaw BRAD

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    32,612
    Likes Received:
    199,302
    Location:
    North Haven, Connecticut
    Interesting read Mike. Nice to see something in print that is almost right!
     
  3. Backwoods Savage

    Backwoods Savage Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2013
    Messages:
    46,933
    Likes Received:
    295,546
    Location:
    Central MI
    It is a shame that an article starting out so good ended so bad. It made sense enough so that Mr & Mrs homeowner could follow it. But the trouble with so many is that the make so much sense that then people will start to believe it all. The following is a prime example:

    "To burn reasonably clean, firewood has to have less than 25% moisture. Wood is hygroscopic, that is it absorbs moisture from the air depending on the humidity. However, even in extremely humid conditions, wood that has been covered for six months or more will not have over 20% moisture.

    "If you’re curious about the actual moisture content of your firewood, hand-held moisture meters are available in the $25 to $50 price range at many hardware stores. It’s a small investment for peace of mind. Also, some North Country libraries have these tools available to borrow for the day."


    Well, even before the above we are led to believe you burn this year what you cut this year. 12 months indeed is fine for lots of wood but will cause problems with others. I also do not like wood at 25% moisture. And for sure, "even in extremely humid conditions, wood that has been covered for six months or more will not have over 20% moisture."


    Again, it started out to be a really good article but those comments at the end certainly shows the author did not get the information via experience, but from reading other articles or listening to other people.

    I really did like the way they used the example of boiling the water out of the wood. I may even take that idea and update the Primer on Woodburning by Backwoods Savage
     
    VTWoodchuck, ThomH123, Maina and 5 others like this.
  4. MikeInMa

    MikeInMa

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2016
    Messages:
    14,569
    Likes Received:
    103,927
    Location:
    Southern Worcester county
    Agreed.

    Thus my commen about it being "decent" and not "excellent".

    I'm glad to see you read something that gets added to the FHC woodburning manual :thumbs:
     
    Maina, moresnow, metalcuttr and 2 others like this.
  5. Maina

    Maina

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2018
    Messages:
    1,618
    Likes Received:
    11,317
    Location:
    Maine
    They have the right idea, but like Dennis said they’re only part way there. Softwood might be ready in 6 months. Maybe that’s where they got that part. It’s hard to believe the lack of awareness and I will never understand people not wanting to know the facts before they start such a potentially dangerous pastime. I guess that’s where all the accidents happen. But like has already been said “you can’t fix stupid”
     
  6. oldspark

    oldspark

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2014
    Messages:
    2,534
    Likes Received:
    7,441
    Location:
    NW Iowa
    Yep good article except for their numbers, sometimes you learn by doing and sometimes you do by learning.
     
    Backwoods Savage likes this.
  7. Dumf

    Dumf Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    2,867
    Location:
    Maine
    Msr. Dennis has it again. Kudos. :handshake:
    Next to come : an article on Japanese forest bathing.