In a conversation before a the GTG at Dennis's the general consensuses was that I could use 40:1 gas in my Stihl saw. The 50:1 was to meet EPA standards. I mixed my 40 and 50 gas to empty a can. The saw runs good on that gas. I bought a Kombi 4 mix. Does the same thing apply to it? I don't completely understand the mixed four stroke theory.
the "4-mix" requires a 2 cycle mix, but it's actually a 4-stroke engine, complete with camshafts, pushrods, valves, rockers and valve springs... it does NOT have a crankcase for oil-lube, so lube must go through the engine.
From what I am gathering from your post, a little heavier oil mixture should not hurt the engine. I need to use up that jug of gas.
4mix engines have carbon issues. The more oil you mix the bigger a problem this is going to be. Some oils are worse than others. I say go with the manufacturers recommendation of 50:1 on everything.
That's why I should of said I would use a good proven synthetic oil. Little to no carbon issues from them.
It's highly dependent on the oil you use, but going from 50:1 to 40:1 often results in cleaner internals. I've run AMSOIL Sabre Pro, Dominator, and TruFuel (all at 40:1) through both of my 4-mix engines with no trouble. Proper carb tuning and ignition system performance will go a long ways to prevent carbon issues. With a 4-mix, throttle response should be instant and strong, with a very clean, staccato exhaust note while running under load.
I had not heard of the 4-mix engine before. Pray tell, if it still requires mixed fuel, what is the advantage?
Less emissions =Meeting EPA requirements... more torque...better fuel efficiency The 4 mix doesn't have a oil sump and oil pump/feed system for lubrication (so you still need the mixed gas) which saves on weight and moving parts
Mixed fuel IS the advantage. Unlike other mini four-strokes, it doesn't have separate fluids to maintain, and lubricates in any position equally well.
When I asked about the advantage, I meant advantage over 2-cycle. I believe the emissions are cleaner (though since it's still burning oil, I question how much), but it's going to be heavier than a 2-cycle and much more complicated.
The emissions issue with traditional two-strokes centers around raw fuel being discharged into the exhaust during the cylinder scavanging cycle. Valves and four-strokes eliminate this while also making the engines quieter and torquey. All of this comes at a penalty of slightly increased mechanical complexity, a bit of weight, and a lower top-end rev limit. (Usually about 11k). In the Kombi type powerheads (split-boom, meant for attachments) these engines are notably good at cultivating and power sweeping in addition to being little monsters with the brush cutter and trimmer heads. With the backpack blowers, they have great throttle control and response throughout their rpm range, drink far less fuel than a traditional 2 stroke and are usually noticeably quieter given a certain output level.
Thats the way I see it also. The more oil u use the less likely it will combust completely which will stay wet and wash the motor instead of making a byproduct of full combustion, carbon?
I like the 4-mix engine for trimmers etc..but in my experience its just not soemthing that holds up for long periods of WOT use. Ive worked with br600's for years at previous places of employment and they just dont hold up. Valves and seats and weak little plastic bits wear out and then your stuck with a $500 blower that you got 100 hours out of and will cost you $500 to rebuild. Ill take a redmax blower all day over a 4-mix blower. But for other applications they are actually very nice to use.